Semnan University of Medical Sciences

Research and Technology Vice Chancellor

Hajihasani, A. and Rouhani, M. and Salavati, M. and Hedayati, R. and Kahlaee, A.H. (2019) The influence of cognitive behavioral therapy on pain, quality of life, and depression in patients receiving physical therapy for chronic low back pain: A systematic review. PM and R, 11. pp. 167-176. ISSN 19341482

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of adding the cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) component to routine physical therapy (PT) on pain and depression reduction, improvement in quality of life, and enhanced function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Type: Systematic review. Literature Survey: Google Scholar, PubMed, Ovid, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase electronic databases were explored for the key terms of “behavioral (or behavioural) treatment” OR “behavior (behaviour) treatment” OR “behavior (behaviour) therapy” OR “cognitive behavior (or behaviour) treatment” OR “cognitive treatment” OR “cognitive therapy” OR “oper-ant behavior (or behaviour) treatment” OR “respondent behavior (or behaviour) treatment” AND “physical therapy” OR “physiother-apy” OR “exercise therapy” OR “electrotherapy” OR “electrical therapy” OR “manual therapy” OR “myofascial therapy” OR “rehabilitation” AND “low back pain” OR “lower back pain” OR “back pain” OR “chronic back pain” OR “chronic lower back pain”, with no limitation on language, through January 2018. Methodology: All randomized controlled trials that statistically compared the effectiveness of CBT + PT and PT were included for quality analysis. Studies were rated by high to poor quality, using Hailey’s classification, based on their design and performance. Synthesis: Of the 10 included studies, 7 were rated as high quality and 3 as good quality. Although CBT + PTwas found to be superior to PT for pain, disability, quality of life, and functional capacity variables in some of the included studies, no extra benefit from CBT was documented in other investigations. The included studies also failed to show any advantage of CBT + PT over PT in reducing depression, and PTwas even found to be superior to CBT + PT in one high-quality study. Conclusions: Although appearing to be advantageous by reducing pain and disability and enhancing functional capacity and quality of life, CBT effects on depression cannot be teased out from the effects of PT. Level of Evidence: I © 2018 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Medical Sciences > School of Medicine
Depositing User: Admin User
Date Deposited: 27 Mar 2019 10:29
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2019 10:29
URI: http://eprints.semums.ac.ir/id/eprint/1566

Actions (login required)

View Item